Obviously they are not directly comparable as one has fisheye distortion and the other is rectilinear however the prevailing school of thought for underwater wide angle is fisheye looking optics not rectilinear.įor your information I shoop topside I own a 24-70GMII a Tamron 35-150 a Sony 24/1. Build and Handling 01:30 Autofocus Performance 105:01 Image Quality 06:40 Summation 14:20 Read the Text Review and Visit the Image Gallery: https://b. As I was trying to explain (and you would know if you shoot underwater I presume you don't) water contact optics with small kit lenses can beat much more expensive optics behind a dome port. When paired with the worlds smallest and lightest iv FE 28-60mm F4-5. (Image credit: Rod Lawton/Digital Camera World) The Sony FE 28-60mm f/4-5.6 is very sharp, but the minimum focus distance increases with the zoom setting, making close-ups a bit hit and miss. Your assumption is indeed presumptuos as you expect I have no idea what lenses I have or not and think that I bought an A1 to get a 28-60mm lens with it? The Alpha 7C is the worlds smallest and lightest ii full-frame body with uncompromising performance, featuring advanced AF (autofocus), high-resolution 4K video iii capabilities and more. What are Sony Rewards Points Sony Rewards is a free loyalty program in which. The Sony FE 28-60mm f/4-5.6 has great edge-to-edge sharpness but a limited 2.1x zoom range. This does not take away that the limitations of the master lens in performance balance out the adapters so if you are comparing the WWL-1 with the WACP-C and the WACP-1 you need to take into account that due to the lens limitations the improvement will not be like between night and dayįor your information I shoop topside I own a 24-70GMII a Tamron 35-150 a Sony 24/1.4 Macro 90mm GM 100-400 and G200-600 so I have an idea about lenses That is until we recently tested an exciting new combination - the recent Sony 28-60mm f/4-5.6 kit lens paired with the Nauticam WWL-1 Wet Wide Angle. Notice the corners have a nice bokeh but arent fuzzy - even at f/11. Obviously they are not directly comparable as one has fisheye distortion and the other is rectilinear however the prevailing school of thought for underwater wide angle is fisheye looking optics not rectilinear. A crocodile captured with the Sony 28-60mm kit lens and Nauticam WWL-1 wet wide lens by Kyle Wagener. Click to expand.Uhm no it does not work like that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |